Thursday, October 28, 2010

Chronicle of a Death Foretold: The dissection of a Society


Chronicle of a death foretold is another masterpiece by Gabriel Garcia Marquez. The novella is a mystifying and gripping work, not in its construction of plot and storyline, of which there is none, but in its dive into the psychology of the society as a whole.
http://img1.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/n0/n888.jpg
The entire novel is built around the murder of one Santiago Nasar who is believed to have dishonored Angela Vicario. Marquez has interestingly used pseudo-journalistic techniques in writing the Chronicle, but has refrained from giving any explanation of most of the facts as such. The narrator interviews the people about the murder which happened 27 years ago, collects evidences, and builds entire chronology of the murder. The plot is revealed in the title itself and as we read a little we know of the storyline completely. The rest of the novel then revolves around the responses of various individuals to the impending murder and on the pretext of building the story further, mocks the patriarchal Columbian society in the face.

In the Chronicle, Marquez comes much closer to social realism than he did in One Hundred Years of Solitude. We see in Chronicle how a few irrational traditions can prevail over reason for the entire populace. Marquez makes us realize how deep-seated the honor codes are in our sub-conscious and how we unknowingly adhere to them. Women are expected to follow a certain level of conduct, they are expected to be pure and virgin and shy while men are supposed to be tough emotionally and physically. Marquez's characters embrace this 'womanhood' and 'manhood' but its an imposed misery on them. Chronicle in this way acts as a satire on the traditional and ritualistic aspects of a society. Angela Vicario has to be returned to her parents' house after she is proved not to be a virgin. And though the groom lives his life in misery later, and the bride's brothers don't wish to kill the perpetrator, it becomes a matter of honor and actions have to be taken. Marquez makes his point, and does so in length throughout the novel without writing a word about it. That indeed is a beautiful aspect of Marquez's work.

Chronicle is an intricately woven piece, handcrafted with such a beauty that the reader is caught in its outer view and the detailed textures are missed. In a small almost hidden line we see the narrator proposing to his future wife, and how ironical this is to the larger context of the novel! And the note lying on the floor is perhaps Marquez's jab on the literary culture in the Latin America. The book is a farce on the torpidity of the people in the region. Every individual in the town has a foreknowledge of the murder but nobody tries to stop it. The murders are desperately awaiting some meddler who might reason with them and stop their act, but the entire townis unperturbed. And if the reader wants a reason for it, he is given none! He is just left to wonder or scorn at the happenings. the surprises aren't over yet. We never know what makes Angela say Santiago's name in the first place, much less about what drives her crazy over her ex husband. Such mystifying behaviors of the characters go on and are imbibed excellently in the story.

The social behavior notwithstanding, many other events bring out the surrealistic nature of the novel. Magical realism has always been Marquez's fortress and we see him using it in a diminished amount in the backdrop of his storytelling. So dreams are correctly interpreted, bullets cross walls to turn sculptures to dust, and spirits are talked to. The final killing, so brutal, is shown in so obvious a way that it could happen to anybody. Leave alone magical realism, even the symbolism in the Chronicle is overwhelming. While we see the bishop avoiding the town, we see the priest killing Santiago for “the second time” showing perhaps the bigger criminal of his death. This truly brings out Marquez's command on the language.

Marquez is indeed an artist when it comes to language, and Chronicle, a beautiful piece of art.

7 comments:

  1. One Hundred Years of Solitude is a great book and after reading it, I wanted more of Marquez's works! So you can imagine my disappointment when I picked this up, read it and found it very different from OHYoS. The book isn't bad - it's just that OHYoS had set a very high benchmark and it couldn't meet my expectations, primarily due to a lack of action and suspense.

    But I was very impressed with the the way the exact murder is unfolded to the reader. The book isn't a dry retelling of a gory crime - it's a confusing, intriguing story simply because of the way it has been written. Marquez describes the murder like he's solving a jigsaw puzzle - a piece here, a piece there and it all comes together in the end to form a complete picture. Over the course of the novel, he presents many different views of that fateful morning, but the crime itself isn't recounted until the very end of the novel.

    This method of telling a story is not easy - one can't help but appreciate Marquez's skill as a writer as he pulls if off very successfully!

    ReplyDelete
  2. That comment was by Nishit, by the way!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. After reading 'One hundred Years of Solitude' this novel does seem like a light reading. What is amazing about this novel is that García Márquez is able to keep the readers on their toes by continuously putting in fresh spins to this rather simple and straightforward plot. The story is essentially about a murder about which the entire village is aware of in advance but no one acts upon that knowledge. Márquez constantly draws our attention to details which seem unnecessary at first, but means a whole lot later. Due to the briefness of the novel, there is no room for character development as such but he does that along the narration in the form of anecdotes and graphic sketches of village tales. With a single incident he puts the integrity of the entire village into test and raises the serious question of honour and how far one can go in the name of honour code. Though these questions are left unanswered along with several other ambiguities, I personally feel it is really interesting to ponder upon them without being given the answers. Afterall a good novel is one which forces its reader to think!

    GAURAV BARUAH
    2009ME20660

    ReplyDelete
  5. "With a single incident he puts the integrity of the entire village into test and raises the serious question of honour and how far one can go in the name of honour code."

    I think that Marquez could really have made the novel revolve around this one concept - it would have been a very interesting read. Whether the rest of the village was responsible for the murder or not is highly debatable - a lot of people knew what the brothers had planned, but most of them didn't act because they thought that Santiago already knew! There is not a single character who doesn't warn Santiago out of spite.

    This raises some very interesting questions - what is the extent of our responsibility towards society? In such cases, is non-involvement also a crime?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think the novel would not have the impact it has now had it been based on that single concept. Its open endedness is one of its main high points. Marquez has left for us to decide whether the villagers are right or wrong in not informing Santiago. On one hand they have the honour code and on the other the social responsibility of looking out for one another.
    As for if non involvement is a crime, point of views are really going to differ from person to person. Even if Marquez gave us a clear cut verdict of whether the villagers were right or wrong, it would just be his opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe had the novel been just restricted to the plot of honour killing and how it affects the daily turn of events in the village, the novel wouldn't have stood for much. There was just one question of honour raised, of female virginity, but many other issues of illiteracy, the treatment of women at the hands of men, like. And though I agree that A Hundred Years of Solitude was a better constructed novel in many ways, this was a journalistic piece with the events laid down backwards. It should be prudent to not compare them together.
    Also, the villagers didn't warn Santiago, and though he was hated, it was more due to fright and indifference rather than spite that he wasn't told..

    ReplyDelete